跳到主要内容

CDA增强型文档知识

汽车工业 · 质量部门

一家汽车零部件供应商如何证明其供应商合规。

Caillau 需要从主机厂规格书中抽取要求、匹配内部程序,并产出可辩护卷宗——不能漏掉嵌套要求。

全部案例

关键指标

客户
Caillau
行业
汽车工业
职能
质量部门
状态
验收中
部署
本地部署(容器)

背景

Automotive supplier working with many OEMs. First AI project in the group: systematically analyse customer specifications, standards and procedures.

问题

  • Estimated €150,000 a year of manual analysis, with no guarantee of full coverage.
  • Long, multilingual documents with nested requirements. A “drawer” omission is a non-compliance risk.
  • Judgements were undocumented: facing an auditor, the answer was a memory, not a file.

方案

Seven-step pipeline: multi-format parsing, requirements extraction (including nested references), procedure indexing, semantic matching, scoring, justification comments, HITL validation before export.

调用的 NEXA 组件

组件 作用
Arbitration algorithm RAG + keywords + heuristics
Evidence Panel Score, matched sources, lineage per requirement
HITL Quality validation before export
AI Knowledge Vault Reusable compliance patterns
Audit Pack Standardised export for auditors

影响

维度 具体影响
Compliance Systematic requirements analysis; fewer omissions.
Productivity Reduction of the annual manual-analysis cost (est. €150,000).
Quality Client score estimated 80/100 from the first demonstration.

CDA增强型文档知识

« 演示即给出约 80/100 的评分,有信心再经几次迭代收敛。 »

质量负责人, 法国汽车零部件供应商 可在 NDA 下披露的参考

您的业务仪式具有同样的潜力。

证据不是约束,而是产品本身。

准备好 规模化落地 您的决策?